Early Richard Batterham - RB mark England stamp

Hi,
New to the forum is there anyone who can identify whether this was Richard’s or Rueben’s mark.
I bought the piece as part of a lot consisting of 4 pieces - all were sold to me as by Richard Batterham from his Durweston estate.
There was no mention in the catalogue of the marks or the damage which is substantial.
I have questioned whether it was by Richard with the Auction House……they initially just didn’t answer and then when pushed refused to answer that question and others!!

Welcome to the forum, I look forward to seeing your other pots

Many thanks

Thanks Dantheman - I’ve got a few you might like they are virtually all associated with the Leach Pottery!

Good morning,
I have been reading the thread regarding the early mark by Richard Batterham and the conversation Studio Pots had with Rueben.
I think some of you will remember my moaning about a lot I bought at the Wooley & Wallis auction of Richard’s estate consigned by his family. In fairness to myself I had only just started collecting and I think it was my naïveté which resulted in the moan.
Anyway I was contacted by a forum member recently about the pot which resulted in a bit more research and my reading of the thread.
I thought I would throw this in the mix but then couldn’t locate the thread to add it.
I do think it relevant . I corresponded with Michael Jeffrey from W & W. He informed me that the piece was made by Richard and that the family had told him that Richard broke the little bud vase himself and mended it himself.
I did try to correspond with Ruben but got no response unfortunately.
Anyway the piece not only has the RB impressed stamp - not R:B but it also has the impressed ENGLAND stamp. That puts it out of range of Ruben as he wasn’t born until 1967.
Given the provenance the only reasoned logical conclusion I can reach is that this mark RB is Richard Batterham.

Thanks for the additional information.

I haven't been able to find the thread with my conversation with Reuben either. What it needs is for me to combine all of the relevant information under the Richard Batterham thread and once I have I will let you know.

Thanks SP reliable as always.

Are the extra photos any good Naomi?

Is that because of my settings?
I took a picture blew it up and then took a screenshot but it was too large to load in terms of Pixels I think

I’ll try!!

Hi Philpot - it is England I posted it on my first listing - it’s a mess.
The only relevance is it’s Richard Batterham and his mark.
I had been reading the thread from some time ago and it provides clarity for his impressed mark.
Kind regards
Neil62

philpot wrote:Thanks for that. I wonder if the mark adds   great deal of  value to the piece? WELL DONE!

Thanks for that Philpot - I was keeping it as a reminder NOT to forget condition reports but it is really badly damaged.
I had forgotten it had the ENGLAND stamp on it and had actually thought it was more likely by Ruben but he wasn’t born until 1967 and obviously the England mark would be 60s. Michael Jeffrey was insistent that Richard made it Broke it and then repaired it. All of which came from Richard’s family.
Kind regards
Neil62